Employment law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1

betrothal law - Essay Examplebased on trust or belief, disability, age or familiar orientation as regards the areas covered by this Directive should be prohibited throughout the Community.1following this directive, The Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 came into effect on December 2, 2003. Section 2 of the Regulations, define godliness in very broad terms as religion or belief means any(prenominal) religion, religious belief, or similar philosophical belief.2 Section 44 of the Equality Act 2006 defines religion or belief in very similar terms.3The 2003 Regulations are not unlike the legislative furnish for the prevention of favoritism on the grounds of sex and race. In other words discrimination piece of ass be either direct or indirect. In order to properly advise Mr. David Williams it will be necessary to look at previous case law and the application of indirect and direct discrimination by reference to established law in the area of sex and race dis crimination.The Regulations are relevant to areas of employment that generally cover recruitment terms, promotions, transfers, dismissals and training. Direct discrimination infers intervention of an employee less favourably than the treatment of others on the basis of that persons religion or belief. corroboratory discrimination will founder to situations in which a criteria, practice or provision is adapted in the absence of a nigh(a) and/or fair reason and disadvantages a person of a certain religion or belief.5 Indirect discrimination is by and large concerned, with the application of a similar set of rules to a similar congregation despite the fact that the rules will affect the members of the group in vastly different ways.The European administration of Justice has been rather clear regarding its position on discrimination of any kind as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms. Religious freedom has been found to be no less importa nt than any other right. In Kokkinakis v Greece it was